|
|
 |
|
GCE
The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model, a cloud resolving model
(CRM), has been developed and improved at NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center over the past two decades. The development and main features
of the GCE model were published in Tao and Simpson (1993) and Tao et
al. (2003b). A review of the applications of the GCE model
to develop a better understanding of precipitation processes can be
found in Simpson and Tao (1993) and Tao (2003). The 3D version
of the GCE model is typically run using 256 x 256 up to 1024 x 1024
horizontal grid points at 1-2 km resolution or better. An MPI
version of the GCE model was recently developed (Juang et al. 2006). It
is well documented and easy to modify and improve. It is also
flexible enough to run on many different platforms using any number
of CPUs.
A Kessler-type two-category liquid water (cloud water and rain) microphysical
formulation is used with a choice of two three-class ice formulations
(3ICE), namely that by Lin et al. (1983) and the Lin scheme
modified to adopt slower graupel fall speeds as reported by Rutledge
and Hobbs (1984). The sedimentation of falling ice crystals was
recently included in the GCE scheme based on Heymsfield and Donner (1990)
and Heymsfield and Iaquinta (2000) and was discussed in detail in Hong et
al. (2004). An improved four-class, multiple-moment ice scheme
(4ICE) has been developed and tested for several convective systems
in different geographic locations (Ferrier 1994; Ferrier et al. 1995). The
4ICE scheme requires only minimal tuning compared to the 3ICE schemes. In
addition to the 4ICE scheme, two detailed, spectral-bin models (Khain et
al. 1999, 2000; Chen and Lamb 1999) have been implemented into
the GCE model. Atmospheric aerosols are described using number
density size-distribution functions. The explicit spectral-bin
microphysics can be used to study cloud-aerosol interactions and nucleation
scavenging of aerosols as well as the impact of different concentrations
and size distributions of aerosol particles upon cloud formation. Please
see Appendix A for a more detailed description of the GCE model. These
new microphysical schemes require the multidimensional positive definite
advection transport algorithm (MPDATA; Smolarkiewicz and Grabowski 1990)
to avoid "decoupling" between mass and number concentration. Solar
and infrared radiative transfer processes (Chou and Suarez 1999; Chou et
al. 1999). Subgrid-scale (turbulent) processes in the GCE model
includes the effects of both dry and moist processes on the generation
of subgrid-scale turbulent kinetic energy (Klemp and Wilhelmson 1978;
Soong and Ogura 1980). |
| |
 |
Image above : Evolution of apparent heat
source (Q1) averaged over TOGA COARE IFA for 8-day period
19-27 December 1992: (a) derived diagnostically from soundings
(Lin and Johnson 1996); and simulated from GCE-CRM model over: (b) entire
region, (c) convective region, and (d) stratiform region. [Red
contours -- positive; blue contrours -- negative. Contour interval is
5ºC
day-1.]
|
 |
| Images above: Vertical profiles of accumulated domain-time averaged
LH components over (a) convective region and (b) stratiform region
consisting of condensation (solid red), evaporation (solid blue),
deposition (dashed red), sublimation (dashed blue), freezing
(solid brown), melting (solid turquoise), and total (solid black). |
 |
| Image above: Three left-most pairs of diagrams illustrate isometric
projections of volume hydrometeor distributions (upper panels) and plan-view
near-surface rain rates (lower panels) for instantaneous realizations
from GCE-CRM simulations of SCSMEX, KWAJEX, and DOE-ARM MCS storm
cases. Upper panel iso-surface color scheme assigns: (i) white
for cloud droplets and ice crystals, (ii) blue for snow, (iii)
red for graupel and hail, and (iv) green for rain. Right-most
diagram pair shows near-surface, forward-modeled radar reflectivities
for TRMM-LBA easterly (upper panel) and westerly (lower panel)
regime MCS cases. |
 |
| Image above: KWAJEX rainfall time
series consisting of measured and modeled rain rates. Both KPOL-Radar
measurements and TRMM-PR retrievals are given for entire IOP, while GCE-CRM
simulated estimates are provided from 29 August through 12 September (both
2D and 3D CRM designs are used for simulated rainfall). [Top diagram from
Yuter et al. (2004).] |
 |
Image above: KWAJEX Q1 heating time series consisting of diagnostically-calculated
and GCE-CRM simulated profiles for three different time series during
1999 IOP: (a) 7-12 August (5-day), (b) 18-21 August (3-day), and (c)
29 August - 12 September (15-day). Green and red contours indicate positive
and negative apparent heating regions, respectively.
|
|
|