Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation Jump to section navigation.
NASA Logo - Goddard Space Flight Center + Visit NASA.gov
Mesoscale Dynamics and Modeling Group
ABOUT US MODELS CLOUD LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS

  +Home

 

Models
GCE
COUPLED FVGCM-GCE
COUPLED WRF-GCE-LIS

GCE

The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model, a cloud resolving model (CRM), has been developed and improved at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center over the past two decades.  The development and main features of the GCE model were published in Tao and Simpson (1993) and Tao et al. (2003b).  A review of the applications of the GCE model to develop a better understanding of precipitation processes can be found in Simpson and Tao (1993) and Tao (2003).  The 3D version of the GCE model is typically run using 256 x 256 up to 1024 x 1024 horizontal grid points at 1-2 km resolution or better.  An MPI version of the GCE model was recently developed (Juang et al. 2006).  It is well documented and easy to modify and improve.  It is also flexible enough to run on many different platforms using any number of CPUs.           

A Kessler-type two-category liquid water (cloud water and rain) microphysical formulation is used with a choice of two three-class ice formulations (3ICE), namely that by Lin et al. (1983) and the Lin scheme modified to adopt slower graupel fall speeds as reported by Rutledge and Hobbs (1984).  The sedimentation of falling ice crystals was recently included in the GCE scheme based on Heymsfield and Donner (1990) and Heymsfield and Iaquinta (2000) and was discussed in detail in Hong et al. (2004).  An improved four-class, multiple-moment ice scheme (4ICE) has been developed and tested for several convective systems in different geographic locations (Ferrier 1994; Ferrier et al. 1995).  The 4ICE scheme requires only minimal tuning compared to the 3ICE schemes.  In addition to the 4ICE scheme, two detailed, spectral-bin models (Khain et al. 1999, 2000; Chen and Lamb 1999) have been implemented into the GCE model.  Atmospheric aerosols are described using number density size-distribution functions.  The explicit spectral-bin microphysics can be used to study cloud-aerosol interactions and nucleation scavenging of aerosols as well as the impact of different concentrations and size distributions of aerosol particles upon cloud formation.  Please see Appendix A for a more detailed description of the GCE model.  These new microphysical schemes require the multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm (MPDATA; Smolarkiewicz and Grabowski 1990) to avoid "decoupling" between mass and number concentration.  Solar and infrared radiative transfer processes (Chou and Suarez 1999; Chou et al. 1999). Subgrid-scale (turbulent) processes in the GCE model includes the effects of both dry and moist processes on the generation of subgrid-scale turbulent kinetic energy (Klemp and Wilhelmson 1978; Soong and Ogura 1980).

 
Evolution of apparent heat source (Q1) averaged over TOGA COARE IFA for 8-day period 19-27 December 1992

Image above : Evolution of apparent heat source (Q1) averaged over TOGA COARE IFA for 8-day period 19-27 December 1992: (a) derived diagnostically from soundings (Lin and Johnson 1996); and simulated from GCE-CRM model over: (b) entire region, (c) convective region, and (d) stratiform region. [Red contours -- positive; blue contrours -- negative. Contour interval is 5ºC day-1.]

Vertical profiles of accumulated domain-time averaged LH components over (a) convective region and (b) stratiform region consisting of condensation, evaporation, deposition, sublimation, freezing, meltin, and total.
Images above: Vertical profiles of accumulated domain-time averaged LH components over (a) convective region and (b) stratiform region consisting of condensation (solid red), evaporation (solid blue), deposition (dashed red), sublimation (dashed blue), freezing (solid brown), melting (solid turquoise), and total (solid black).
Diagrams illustrating isometric projections of volume hydrometeor distributions and plan-view near-surface rain rates for instantaneous realizations from GCE-CRM simulations of SCSMEX, KWAJEX and DOE-ARM MCS storm cases
Image above: Three left-most pairs of diagrams illustrate isometric projections of volume hydrometeor distributions (upper panels) and plan-view near-surface rain rates (lower panels) for instantaneous realizations from GCE-CRM simulations of SCSMEX, KWAJEX, and DOE-ARM MCS storm cases. Upper panel iso-surface color scheme assigns: (i) white for cloud droplets and ice crystals, (ii) blue for snow, (iii) red for graupel and hail, and (iv) green for rain. Right-most diagram pair shows near-surface, forward-modeled radar reflectivities for TRMM-LBA easterly (upper panel) and westerly (lower panel) regime MCS cases.
KWAJEX rainfall time series consisting of measured and modeled rain rates
Image above: KWAJEX rainfall time series consisting of measured and modeled rain rates. Both KPOL-Radar measurements and TRMM-PR retrievals are given for entire IOP, while GCE-CRM simulated estimates are provided from 29 August through 12 September (both 2D and 3D CRM designs are used for simulated rainfall). [Top diagram from Yuter et al. (2004).]
KWAJEX Q1 heating time series consisting of diagnostically-calculated and GCE-CRM simulated profiles for 3 different time series

Image above: KWAJEX Q1 heating time series consisting of diagnostically-calculated and GCE-CRM simulated profiles for three different time series during 1999 IOP: (a) 7-12 August (5-day), (b) 18-21 August (3-day), and (c) 29 August - 12 September (15-day). Green and red contours indicate positive and negative apparent heating regions, respectively.

FirstGov logo + Privacy Policy and Important Notices NASA Curator: Paul Przyborski
NASA Official: Wei-Kuo Tao
Last Updated: 06/07/2006